
A jury in California has found Samsung guilty of willfully copying Apple's iPad and iPhone
Samsung must pay Apple $1.05bn (about £660m) for infringing several patents in its tablets and smartphones, a California jury has decided. The verdict came after a month-long trial that had grabbed headlines around the globe.
The verdict ended a trial between the two companies. In most instances, the jury found Samsung products infringed Apple's patents. The case also included claims by Samsung that Apple had infringed its patents, but the jury found none of those claims were valid.
The case, which ran from Monday 30 July until Friday 24 August, saw Apple try to prove that Samsung had wilfully copied the design of the iPad and iPhone, while the South Korean giant tried to disprove Apple's patents, claiming they were invalid. Highlights include d a damning Samsung email that discussed the impact of the iPhone and a "crisis in design" at Samsung The email said the difference between Samsung and Apple smartphones was like "a difference between Heaven and Earth".
Samsung's defence rested on proving that Apple's patents were not valid, attempting to use `priOr art' to disqualify the iPhone maker's patents. Apple, unsurprisingly, dismissed these early examples as not identical to its own patents.
At times, it seemed like Samsung's legal team was grasping at straws, and at other times that they were just inept. For example, it emerged at one stage that one of its lawyers didn't have a licence to practise law in the court.
Lookalike Jurors found that Samsung had willfully copied the design of Apple's iPhone and iPad.
Willful infringement
The verdict is a huge win for Apple, although the award was less than half of the $2.75bn (£1.73bn) in damages Apple was seeking. However, since the jury found Samsung guilty of wilful infringement of certain patents, Judge Lucy Koh could triple this.
An Apple spokesperson said: "The mountain of evidence presented during the trial showed that Samsung's copying went far deeper than even we knew." Samsung was quick to fire out a statement claiming Apple is engaging in "outright abuse of patent law, not pursuit of innovation".
Seeing Double Samsung was also found guilty of copying other elements, such as icons.
In a separate statement, the company argued: "It is unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners, or technology that is being improved every day by Samsung and other companies."
Samsung claims that other trials, in the UK, the Netherlands, Germany and Korea: "Have previously ruled that we did not copy Apple's designs. These courts also recognised our arguments concerning our standards patents."
While it's true that the simultaneous verdict of a Seoul jury found Apple guilty of copying some Samsung patents, Samsung was also found guilty in that case. The verdict by a UK judge that Apple can't claim that Samsung copied the iPad because "it's not as cool as the iPad" will go to appeal this autumn.
The trial might be over, but the battle will rumble on for some time. Judge Lucy Koh has scheduled a hearing for 20 September, where the two sides will argue over removing the current injunction against the Galaxy Tab 10.1.
An Apple request for eight new injunctions isn't due to be heard until 6 December. Apple is also seeking to add the S3 to its list of offending items. Samsung has confirmed that
it will appeal.